[76914] |
Title: Super-resolution approaches for resolution enhancement in magnetic particle imaging. <em>2013</em> |
Written by: A. Timmermeyer, H. Wojtczyk, W. Tenner, G. Bringout, M. Grüttner, M. Graeser, T. Sattel, A. Halkola, and T. M. Buzug |
in: <em>3rd International Workshop on {Magnetic Particle Imaging} ({IWMPI}), IEEE Xplore Digital Library</em>. (2013). |
Volume: Number: |
on pages: |
Chapter: |
Editor: |
Publisher: |
Series: |
Address: |
Edition: |
ISBN: |
how published: |
Organization: |
School: |
Institution: |
Type: |
DOI: 10.1109/IWMPI.2013.6528360 |
URL: |
ARXIVID: |
PMID: |
Note: inproceedings
Abstract: Given a definition of spatial resolution that considers two objects as distinguished if the minimum value of the gap is less than 50\% of the value at the object position [7], both approaches achieved an improvement of the spatial resolution in the 1D simulation study as visualized in Fig. 1 and 2. If the spatial resolution is considered as the minimum width of two distinguished lines, the first approach using spatially shifted images achieved a spatial resolution of 1.7 mm and the second approach using different sampling points achieved a resolution of 2.6 mm. This is an improvement in comparison to the used low resolution images with a spatial resolution of 2 mm (first approach) and 2.9 mm (second approach).
[76914] |
Title: Super-resolution approaches for resolution enhancement in magnetic particle imaging. <em>2013</em> |
Written by: A. Timmermeyer, H. Wojtczyk, W. Tenner, G. Bringout, M. Grüttner, M. Graeser, T. Sattel, A. Halkola, and T. M. Buzug |
in: <em>3rd International Workshop on {Magnetic Particle Imaging} ({IWMPI}), IEEE Xplore Digital Library</em>. (2013). |
Volume: Number: |
on pages: |
Chapter: |
Editor: |
Publisher: |
Series: |
Address: |
Edition: |
ISBN: |
how published: |
Organization: |
School: |
Institution: |
Type: |
DOI: 10.1109/IWMPI.2013.6528360 |
URL: |
ARXIVID: |
PMID: |
Note: inproceedings
Abstract: Given a definition of spatial resolution that considers two objects as distinguished if the minimum value of the gap is less than 50\% of the value at the object position [7], both approaches achieved an improvement of the spatial resolution in the 1D simulation study as visualized in Fig. 1 and 2. If the spatial resolution is considered as the minimum width of two distinguished lines, the first approach using spatially shifted images achieved a spatial resolution of 1.7 mm and the second approach using different sampling points achieved a resolution of 2.6 mm. This is an improvement in comparison to the used low resolution images with a spatial resolution of 2 mm (first approach) and 2.9 mm (second approach).