| [34972] |
| Title: Beyond Publication Counts - The Impact of Citations and Combined Metrics on the Performance Measurement of German Business Researchers. |
| Written by: Meyer, Matthias and Waldkirch, Rüdiger and Zaggl, Michael |
| in: <em>Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft</em>. (2013). |
| Volume: <strong>83</strong>. Number: (Special Issue 3), |
| on pages: 61-86 |
| Chapter: |
| Editor: |
| Publisher: |
| Series: |
| Address: |
| Edition: |
| ISBN: |
| how published: |
| Organization: |
| School: |
| Institution: |
| Type: Journal Article |
| DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-03348-4_4 |
| URL: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-658-03348-4_4 |
| ARXIVID: |
| PMID: |
Note:
Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of going beyond publication counts on the relative performance measurement of German-speaking business administration scholars. Based on data from the Social Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Google Scholar it compares rankings based on publication, citation, and combined measures, such as the h-index. The results from 298 accounting and marketing scholars show that the move from publication to citation counts is a greater step than from citations to the h-indices. A similar observation can be made with respect to refinements of the h-index. We investigate several causes of these effects and show that citation counts and combined measures specify the information content of data sources. The results also suggest that data source coverage is a larger driver of differences than measures. Finally, we find that correlations between rankings based on different data sources can be improved by extending beyond publication measures.